dc.contributor.author | Jepkoech, Jennifer | |
dc.contributor.author | Mugo, David Muchangi | |
dc.contributor.author | Kenduiywo, Benson K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Too, Edna Chebet | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-01T12:49:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-01T12:49:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.chuka.ac.ke/handle/chuka/15466 | |
dc.description.abstract | Learning rates in gradient descent algorithms have
significant effects especially on the accuracy of a Capsule Neural
Network (CNN). Choosing an appropriate learning rate is still an
issue to date. Many developers still have a problem in selecting a
learning rate for CNN leading to low accuracies in classification.
This gap motivated this study to assess the effect of learning rate
on the accuracy of a developed (CNN). There are no predefined
learning rates in CNN and therefore it is hard for researchers to
know what learning rate will give good results. This work,
therefore, focused on assessing the effect of learning rate on the
accuracy of a CNN by using different learning rates and
observing the best performance. The contribution of this work is
to give an appropriate learning rate for CNNs to improve
accuracy during classification. This work has assessed the effect
of different learning rates and came up with the most
appropriate learning rate for CNN plant leaf disease
classification. Part of the images used in this work was from the
PlantVillage dataset while others were from the Nepal database.
The images were pre-processed then subjected to the original
CNN model for classification. When the learning rate was 0.0001,
the best performance was 99.4% on testing and 100% on
training. When the learning rate was 0.00001, the highest
performance was 97% on testing and 99.9% on training. The
lowest performance observed was 81% accuracy on testing and
99% on training when the learning rate was 0.001. This work
observed that CNN was able to achieve the highest accuracy with
a learning rate of 0.0001. The best Convolutional Neural
Network accuracy observed was 98% on testing and 100% on
training when the learning rate was 0.0001. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications;Vol. 12, No. 8 | |
dc.subject | CNN | en_US |
dc.subject | ConvNet | en_US |
dc.subject | learning rate | en_US |
dc.subject | gradient descent | en_US |
dc.title | The Effect of Adaptive Learning Rate on the Accuracy of Neural Networks | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |