Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKariuki, C. M.
dc.contributor.authorKomen, H.
dc.contributor.authorKahi, A. K.
dc.contributor.authorVan Arendonk, J. A. M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T15:20:28Z
dc.date.available2019-12-03T15:20:28Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dairy Science Volume 97, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 7963-7974en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.2014-8545
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.chuka.ac.ke/handle/chuka/482
dc.description.abstract7963J. Dairy Sci. 97 :7963–7974http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.2014-8545 © American Dairy Science Association®, 2014 .ABSTRACT Dairy cattle breeding programs in developing coun-tries are constrained by minimal and erratic pedigree and performance recording on cows on commercial farms. Small-sized nucleus breeding programs offer a viable alternative. Deterministic simulations using se-lection index theory were performed to determine the optimum design for small-sized nucleus schemes for dairy cattle. The nucleus was made up of 197 bulls and 243 cows distributed in 8 non-overlapping age classes. Each year 10 sires and 100 dams were selected to pro-duce the next generation of male and female selection candidates. Conception rates and sex ratio were fixed at 0.90 and 0.50, respectively, translating to 45 male and 45 female candidates joining the nucleus per year. Commercial recorded dams provided information for genetic evaluation of selection candidates (bulls) in the nucleus. Five strategies were defined: nucleus records only [within-nucleus dam performance (DP)], progeny records in addition to nucleus records [progeny test-ing (PT)], genomic information only [genomic selection (GS)], dam performance records in addition to genomic information (GS+DP), and progeny records in addition to genomic information (GS+PT). Alternative PT, GS, GS+DP, and GS+PT schemes differed in the number of progeny per sire and size of reference population. The maximum number of progeny records per sire was 30, and the maximum size of the reference population was 5,000. Results show that GS schemes had higher responses and lower accuracies compared with other strategies, with the higher response being due to short-er generation intervals. Compared with similar sized progeny-testing schemes, genomic-selection schemes would have lower accuracies but these are offset by higher responses per year, which might provide addi-tional incentive for farmers to participate in recording.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectminimal recording ,en_US
dc.subjectbreeding program,en_US
dc.subjectgenomic selection,en_US
dc.subjectgenetic gainen_US
dc.titleOptimizing the design of small-sized nucleus breeding programs for dairy cattle with minimal performance recordingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record