Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGao, Wei
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jie
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Zhiguo
dc.contributor.authorHe, Haiying
dc.contributor.authorLi, Huiwen
dc.contributor.authorHou, Ruili
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Liping
dc.contributor.authorGaichu, Daniel Muthee
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-31T10:03:30Z
dc.date.available2022-10-31T10:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.chuka.ac.ke/handle/chuka/15456
dc.description.abstractBackground Side effects of the use of opioid analgesics during painless delivery are the main factors that affect rapid postpartum recovery. Opioid use can result in dangerous respiratory depression in the patient. Opioids can also disrupt the baby's breathing and heart rate. The nonopioid analgesic dexmedetomidine, a new a2-adrenergic agonist, possesses higher selectivity, greater analgesic effects, and fewer side effects. Moreover, epidural administration of dexmedetomidine also reduces local anesthetic consumption. Objective Our study aims to compare the analgesic effects as well as the side effects of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine against sufentanyl as an epidural labor analgesia. Methods This study is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial (registration no. ChiCTR2200055360) involving 120 primiparous (a woman who has given birth once), singleton pregnancy women who are greater than 38 weeks into gestation and have requested epidural labor analgesia. The participants were randomized to receive 0.1% ropivacaine with sufentanyl (0.4 μg/ml) or dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/ml). The primary outcomes included Visual Analogue Score (VAS), duration of first epidural infusions, the requirement of additional PCEA bolus, and adverse reactions during labor analgesia. Results Of the 120 subjects who consented, 91 parturient women (women in the condition of labor) had complete data for analysis. Demographics and VAS, as well as maternal and fetal outcomes, were similar between the groups. The duration of first epidural infusions in dexmedetomidine was significantly longer than sufentanyl (median value: 115 vs 68 min, P < 0.01); the parturient women who received dexmedetomidine and who required additional PCEA bolus were fewer in comparison to those who received sufentanyl (27.5% vs 49.0%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of pruritus in the dexmedetomidine group was lower in comparison to the sufentanyl group (0% vs 11.8%, P < 0.05). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine, a nonopioid, is superior to the opioid analgesic sufentanyl in providing a prolonged analgesic effect as an epidural during labor. It also reduces local anesthetic consumption and has fewer side effects. The trial is registered with ChiCTR2200055360.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Healthcare Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Healthcare Engineering;
dc.titleOpioid-Free Labor Analgesia: Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant Combined with Ropivacaineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record